WDFH Home | Schedule | News | Music | Join the staff | Support WDFH | Site map | About | Contact
Vol. 10 No. 3 Page 661
Citation: 10 Pace L. Rev. 661 (1990)
Pace University School of Law
Summer, 1990
Marc Sophos
Copyright © 1990 by the Pace Law Review; Marc Sophos
To get a general sense of what the piece is about, read the Introduction and the Conclusion first. Footnotes are at the end of each section.
Comments from prominent individuals about this article:
Mario Cuomo, Governor of New York (11/7/90):
You point out well the great lengths to which Reagan Administration regulators have often gone to carry out their laissez-faire ideology, and the analytic contortions they have performed to get there. To our great cost, the scandals over the savings and loan bailout and the Federal nuclear weapons plant cleanups remind us that reasonable regulation serves essential social purposes. It protects society from the tremendous damage to our human, fiscal and environmental health that laissez-faire would otherwise impose on us.Your work is a useful part of the antidote we need to the deregulatory excesses of the 1980s.
Ervin S. Duggan, FCC Commissioner (10/29/90):
Unfortunately, so much has happened to erode the public interest standard that its future is uncertain. I intend, however, to do what I can to rehabilitate that standard in a form that makes sense in an environment of "light-handed" regulation. As I contemplate how to do that, your article will be most helpful for its historical content and its strong statement of the rationale for the public-interest standard.
Note that some of the sections are rather large and may take some time to download. Please be patient.
I. Introduction (7.1 kb)
II. History of Broadcast Regulation and Establishment of the Public
Interest Standard (42 kb)
III. Deregulation of Broadcasting (16 kb)
IV. A New Development: Twenty-Four Hour Satellite Radio Programming
Services (7.5 kb)
V. Analysis (57 kb)
VI. Conclusion (2.7 kb)